|Subject:||Re: [Bug-gnubg] USE_SSE2|
|Date:||Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:55:48 +0000|
Note that I've changed this recently so it does check for sse2 (if use_sse2 is|
defined) and also it doesn't fallback gracefully if this check fails.
So we should probably build a sse2 build and a non-sse build (maybe a non-sse
build only occasionally?).
Michael Petch wrote:
> On 17/08/09 5:29 AM, "Michael Petch" wrote:
>> I guess for completeness one might consider building a non-sse build for
>> those system.
> Time to go to bed:
> I guess for completeness one might consider building an SSE build for those
> systems (with the -msse flag).
> My opinion is that unless its asked for we might not want to bother.
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
Windows Live Messenger: Celebrate 10 amazing years with free winks and emoticons. Get Them Now
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|