|
From: | Michael Depreli |
Subject: | RE: [Bug-gnubg] Cache question |
Date: | Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:59:42 +0000 |
>From my tests the extra speed from using max cache although not huge was worthwhile. Given like you say >2gb is the norm (I have 4gb) would it be worth having an even larger cache available in gnubg? From: address@hidden To: address@hidden CC: address@hidden Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Cache question Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:37:15 +0000 The only reason is if the memory usage has any impact for you (running several copies at the same time for example), it's getting a lot less likely that this is the case with>2gb becoming the norm on new pcs. You might find that there is little difference in speed between the maximum and one-down setting (and this would save you 80mb of memory). Jon Michael Depreli wrote: > I ran some brief tests using rollouts with different cache settings and > larger cache produced faster results (not linear). > Are there any known issues (bugs) running gnubg with cache set to max > for evals and rollouts for plies up to 2? > If not are there any reasons to not set cache to max? > > Michael > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > View your other email accounts from your Hotmail inbox. Add them now. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > address@hidden > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg Add other email accounts to Hotmail in 3 easy steps. Find out how. New! Receive and respond to mail from other email accounts from within Hotmail Find out how. |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |