|
From: | Jonathan Kinsey |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnubg] compilers other than g++ |
Date: | Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:31:57 +0000 |
I build with the microsoft 2008 compiler (there is a free version of this available). I tried the intel compiler in the past and it wasn't much faster, the microsoft 2005 compiler seemed to catch up with intel in my tests. I haven't compared the speed of gcc to ms lately, but in the past they have been similar. Jon Chuck Bower wrote: > Has anyone ever looked into alternate compilers (such as those sold by > Intel)? Is there an ethical/principled issue against using > non-OpenSource? The goal would be increased speed due to better > optimization, etc. For example, I believe the *Intel® C++ Compiler > Professional Edition for Linux* *has a free trial download and academic > price around $170. (~$2k commercial license). > > Chuck Bower > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > address@hidden > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg > > New! Receive and respond to mail from other email accounts from within Hotmail Find out how. |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |