Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Few recent issues (20090922 code)

[Massimiliano Maini]

We can keep the commands in the CL interface as they are, but
we can still change the labels in the menus and toolbar.

I'm for changing the commands in the CLI too, or at least to define
aliases like next roll = next move, so that backward compatibility
is kept and clearer commands are available too (in sync with GUI).

Also, I really dislike not having the buttons for prev marked and prev
cmarked. if the issue is space, we canmake things smaller or
eventually remove the buttons for prev/next game, since we have the
drop down list anyway.

MaX.

2009/9/22 Christian Anthon <address@hidden>:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Massimiliano Maini <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Other comments:
>>
>> labels on the toolbar are too long and a bit unclear (marked/cmarked).
>> I would:
>>
>> - use "Prev." instead of "Previous", shorter (we can leave previous in the 
>> menu)
>> - replace "Prev./Next Marked" with "Prev./Next Error" (in the menu too)
>>
>> Last thing: "Previous" and "Next" in the toolbar corrspond to "Previous roll"
>> and "Next roll" in the menu. We shold harmonize. Also, I don't like "roll"
>> as it moves through cube decisions too. "Prev.Next decision" would be fine,
>> but it's a bit long for the toolbar. I would settle for "Prev./Next move".
>>
>
> I more or less agrees with you. The reason for the words marked and
> roll is that they match with the commands used in the CL interface...
>
>> Refresh of the new buttons is not working in multiple occasions: they are 
>> often
>> grayed out when they shouldn't.
>
> I think I know why: The match state is not "game playing" before the
> first move record.
>
> Christian.
>