|
From: | Øystein Schønning-Johansen |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnubg] 1-ply vs 0-ply equity improvement |
Date: | Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:05:19 +0100 |
I don't have a head-to-head comparison handy. If I find it, I'll let you know.
However, these are the results of testing the current gnubg (0.15) weights against our benchmark database, which I ran some time ago.
Contact benchmark. One point of total error corresponds to 0.0001565 points per game, according to Øystein's regression analysis.
# Correct# Wrong % Tot. err. Avg. Err Err rate(per move) Error Rate (points per game)
0-ply 74524 32961 30.67% 1122.71 0.03406177 0.010445271 0.175704115
1-ply 76040 31445 29.26% 993.33 0.031589411 0.009241559 0.155456145
2-ply 79480 28005 26.05% 790.55 0.028228748 0.007354943 0.123721075
Subtracting, I would expect 1-ply vs 0-ply to win 0.02 points per game.
-- Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=address@hidden [mailto:bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=address@hidden] On Behalf Of Mark Higgins
Sent: 30 January 2012 01:28
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Bug-gnubg] 1-ply vs 0-ply equity improvement
Does anyone know roughly how much of a cubeless money equity improvement 1-ply enjoys over 0-ply? (And 2-ply vs 1-ply.) I googled around for a while but couldn't find anything.
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |