[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed
From: |
Harald Arnesen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:49:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 |
Simon Sobisch [2017-12-17 21:25]:
>> Works, both on Linux and macOS. Even better than expected, test 710
>> passed unexpectedly :-)
> This is unlikely. Please run
> make clean && make check
> to verify you don't use an old object file in your cobc binary.
After "make distclean" and "./configure", I get the expected
passes/failures on Linux.
>> But on macOS, tests 430 544 545 546 failed.
> These are the screenio tests which don't work on all terminals (because
> the terminal must be initializable even if "in background".
> Often exporting TERM=xterm works, if not other terminals may do...
With "make distclean", "./configure --disable-rpath" and "export
TERM=xterm", I still get a pass on test 710. No unexpected failures.
Is there an object file I can manually remove, to get it properly rebuilt?
--
Hilsen Harald
- [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed,
Harald Arnesen <=
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/18
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/18