Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: `fatal' module problem?

[Paul Eggert]

Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:

> (I kind of preferred `fatal (...)' as it is more readable, though.)

Another advantage of "fatal" would be that GCC can deduce that it
doesn't return, and can generate better code in some cases.

> Unless fatal.* is fixed, perhaps removing the 'modules/fatal' file is
> a good idea, so others don't fall in the same trap as I did.

OK, I removed the "fatal" module's files.  That's good enough for now.