[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:37:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> I've identified the following as being LGPL. (Essentially all modules that
> track glibc source code are LGPL.) All others are GPL.
...
> strdup - all, glibc
The copy in gnulib/lib/ CVS says GPL. Can we re-import the LGPL
version from glibc? I recall writing strdup.h, and I'm fine with
relicensing it under LGPL.
Before asking Richard, I think I need to have a concrete question.
Right now, I need strdup and minmax.h in LGPL projects. strdup is
already available under LGPL. Who are the authors of minmax.h? What
are your feelings about re-licensing it under LGPL? If there is a
problem, I'll ask RMS if he believe it could be made available under
LGPL (and perhaps other files, for similar reasons), or ultimately
rewrite it (and the other files).
Thanks,
Simon
- [Bug-gnulib] licenses again, Simon Josefsson, 2004/09/21
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] licenses again, Bruno Haible, 2004/09/21
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] licenses again, Karl Berry, 2004/09/21
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] licenses again, Bruno Haible, 2004/09/22
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again,
Simon Josefsson <=
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Karl Berry, 2004/09/22
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Simon Josefsson, 2004/09/23
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Bruno Haible, 2004/09/23
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Simon Josefsson, 2004/09/24
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Paul Eggert, 2004/09/24
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Simon Josefsson, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Karl Berry, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Karl Berry, 2004/09/26
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Simon Josefsson, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: licenses again, Bruno Haible, 2004/09/28