[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug? |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Oct 2004 20:35:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> We have an additional clause in our license ...
Also you probably have the requirement that everything in libltdl needs to
be as small as possible?
In gnulib we avoid bloat, but favour flexibility if the cost is low.
(Examples are: exit_failure, xalloc_die() as a separate function, the
delim1 and delim2 parameters of getndelim2, the support for wide characters
in vasnprintf(), etc.) Therefore I think, in the long run, libltdl's
requirements and gnulib's way don't converge.
Bruno
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, Bruno Haible, 2004/10/05
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] getline bug?, P, 2004/10/05
- [Bug-gnulib] getpass problem (was: Re: getline bug?), Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/05
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getpass problem, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/06
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: getpass problem, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/12
[Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Jim Meyering, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Bruno Haible, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: getline bug?, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/10/06