[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:25:42 +0100
* Bruno Haible wrote on Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 02:38:25PM CET:
> Just for info. Here are some notes I collected about 'inline' three months
> ago. If it's too much details, skip the text until "Results" at the bottom :-)
> Which compilers don't yet support inline?
> Solaris 7 cc lacks inline entirely
> HP-UX 11 cc has an unusable inline (return type must not be a typedef)
> IRIX 6 cc has __inline but does not understand extern __inline.
> AIX 4 xlc has __inline, uses the C99 semantics
> OSF/1 5.1 cc has inline, uses the C99 semantics
Could you be bothered to specify this in more detail? Is this AIX 4 or
4.x.y? IRIX 6 or 6.5 (there is a decade in between)? HP-UX 11.00 or
11.23 (and what HP compiler version)? Generally, it's interesting to
know the latest version that still has bugs.
- inline, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/07
- Re: inline,
Ralf Wildenhues <=