[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
From: |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
Subject: |
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." |
Date: |
29 Dec 2006 19:33:29 +0100 |
"Daniel Berlin" <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
| In fact, what they told me was that since they made their change in
| 1991, they have had *1* person who reported a program that didn't
| work.
And GCC made the change recently and got yy reports. That might say
something about both compilers user base. Or not.
Please, feel free to ignore those that don't find the transformations
appropriate, they are just free software written by vocal minority.
-- Gaby
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/12/29
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 2006/12/29
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/12/29
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 2006/12/29
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/12/29
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Daniel Berlin, 2006/12/29
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/12/29
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Florian Weimer, 2006/12/29
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard B. Kreckel, 2006/12/29