Re: canonicalize: remove redundant macro definitions

[Simon Josefsson]

Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:

> There are actually 3 ways to use gnulib:
>   1) manual file copies, considering the contents of the module descriptions,
>   2) using a script based on the elementary --extract-... accessors of
>      gnulib-tool,
>   3) using gnulib-tool --import.

Do we want to guarantee that gnulib should be usable in all these
ways?  In other words, would it be useful to set up an autobuilder
that automates testing of the 3 approaches, and fix whatever problems
that cause such an autobuilder to fail?  Or do we ultimately only care
about 3)?  Personally, I'm not sure.

/Simon