[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1 |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:32:30 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061207 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Eric Blake on 1/10/2007 11:24 AM:
>
> Still not enough; Chris reported another failure offlist. wctype.m4's
> AC_SUBST
> (HAVE_WINT_T) was resulting in an empty string, even though wint_t.m4's
> AC_DEFINE(HAVE_WINT_T, 1, ...) was now guessing correctly:
That part is fixed, but now mbchar.h is pulling in <wchar.h> prior to the
fixed <wctype.h>. At this point, I really think it is easier to generate
a replacement <wchar.h> that takes care of the intricacies, then simplify
all other modules that depend on wchar.h to assume it just works, rather
than fixing all 10 occurrences of the BSD/OS workaround currently in
gnulib/lib/*. Also, there are 8 files in lib/* that check HAVE_WCHAR_H -
is there really a modern platform that lacks this header? If so,
providing a replacement <wchar.h> will also fix those cases, and justify
my efforts more so than making an obsolete platform work.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFpjxu84KuGfSFAYARAgYyAJ4o4PlUx+HFroSss48mtY/950u7aACgyxA1
OVnWFkKw5mFyzfU65ePiJbI=
=a9+0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, (continued)
Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/10
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/10
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/11
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/12
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/12
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/13
Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/12
Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Building m4 on BSDI 4.0.1, Eric Blake, 2007/01/13