[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new module striconveh

From: Simon Josefsson
Subject: Re: new module striconveh
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:48:01 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux)

"James Youngman" <address@hidden> writes:

> On 1/16/07, Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This will be used by the second part of the Unicode string library
> [...]
> Is there a reason not to just use ICU (http://icu.sourceforge.net/)?



For what it's worth, I agree with those arguments.  I have had the
same reasons to avoid ICU in the past.

I've had several bugs reported to me for LibIDN which turned out to be
bugs in ICU (last time a few days ago), so I also have greater
confidence in Bruno's code, and will try to start using some of it in


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]