Re: first draft of "relocatable" module

[Ben Pfaff]

Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:

> For reference, here are the changes that I did, compared to your patch.

Looks good.  

> There is still one problem: The comment at the head of gl_RELOCATABLE
> says that it accepts an argument. But the macro uses always $gl_source_base,
> not $1.

Oops.  I'll follow up later with a fix for this and for
compatibility problems pointed out by others.
-- 
"Implementation details are beyond the scope of the Java virtual
 machine specification.  One should not assume that every virtual
 machine implementation contains a giant squid."
--"Mr. Bunny's Big Cup o' Java"