[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf - call for volunteers
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf - call for volunteers |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 00:08:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Bruce Korb wrote:
> In other words, why worry? Maybe right now
> I don't use the 'a' directive, is it worth the bother to go
> back and fix up configure scripts if the 'a' directive creeps
> into my sources?
You said already in [1] that you don't care about code size. Other people care.
gnulib will offer something for either taste: You can subscribe to the
'snprintf-posix' module, whereas people who just want an snprintf of an
integer (e.g. lib/getaddrinfo.c) are better served with the smaller (but
not always fully POSIX) 'snprintf' module.
Bruno
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-02/msg00239.html
Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf - call for volunteers, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/03/05
Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf - call for volunteers, Albert Chin, 2007/03/07