[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: source(builtin) and read(2)
From: |
Schwarz, Konrad |
Subject: |
RE: source(builtin) and read(2) |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:21:49 +0200 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Blake [mailto:address@hidden
> >>>>> Again, if your ssize_t is smaller than 32 bits, your
> platform has
> >>>>> other issues. Just because POSIX allows ssize_t to be
> as small as
> >>>>> 16 bits doesn't mean many modern platforms do that.
While we're at it, I would be interested in the rational for "inventing"
ssize_t and not using ptrdiff_t instead, if anyone would care to
comment.
Regards,
Konrad
- Re: source(builtin) and read(2), Eric Blake, 2007/03/23
- Re: source(builtin) and read(2), Paul Eggert, 2007/03/23
- Re: source(builtin) and read(2), Bruno Haible, 2007/03/23
- Re: source(builtin) and read(2), Eric Blake, 2007/03/24
- RE: source(builtin) and read(2),
Schwarz, Konrad <=
- Re: source(builtin) and read(2), Clive D.W. Feather, 2007/03/26
- RE: source(builtin) and read(2), Schwarz, Konrad, 2007/03/26
- Re: source(builtin) and read(2), Clive D.W. Feather, 2007/03/26
- RE: source(builtin) and read(2), Nick Stoughton, 2007/03/27
- Re: source(builtin) and read(2), Clive D.W. Feather, 2007/03/27
- Re: source(builtin) and read(2), Matthew Woehlke, 2007/03/27
- RE: source(builtin) and read(2), Matthew Woehlke, 2007/03/27
- Re: source(builtin) and read(2), Paul Eggert, 2007/03/29
- Re: source(builtin) and read(2), Geoff Clare, 2007/03/30