Re: switch to (L)GPLv3

[Bruno Haible]

Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I needed the following modules under LGPLv2.1+:
> 
> dummy
> float
> realloc
> stdlib
> 
> Any objections to this patch?

No objection. We promised you the ability to do such changes, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-07/msg00155.html

> Btw, why is the mnemonic 'LGPLv2+' rather than 'LGPLv2.1+'?

Because it's just a shorthand. It's not worth making the distinction
between LGPL 2.0 and 2.1 in this context, IMO.

Bruno