[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fseeko bug

From: Larry Jones
Subject: Re: fseeko bug
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:50:50 -0500 (EST)

Eric Blake writes:
> Then maybe the best course of action, for now, is just reverting the
> verification I added (since with the verify in place, you can't even
> compile, whereas without the verify, you at least get correct behavior on
> small files), leave the silent overflow in place, and document in
> doc/functions/fseeko.texi that BSD/OS is unable to handle streams larger
> than 2GB and that gnulib does not fix it.

That's fine with me.

-Larry Jones

I think grown-ups just ACT like they know what they're doing. -- Calvin

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]