[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: memmem issues

From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: Re: memmem issues
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 00:20:59 +0100 (MET)

Paul Eggert wrote:
> section
> ...
> Here again, the intent is that memcmp(&x, &y, sizeof (T)) compares all
> the bits in the underlying representation.  The only way to do that
> portably is via "unsigned char *".

OK. Here's a proposed patch for the memmem function.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]