[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: __func__
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: __func__ |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 00:12:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> However, what do you think about this?
Looks all fine to me.
> Hm. As far as I can tell, AC_CHECK_DECLS is not restricted to
> functions, the autoconf manual says "If SYMBOL (a function or a
> variable) is not declared ...".
Ah indeed. It says this when talking about AC_CHECK_DECL. I looked at the
description of AC_CHECK_DECLS only. But anyway, AC_CHECK_DECLS may not
work for symbols that are only defined inside functions.
Bruno
- Re: __func__, Simon Josefsson, 2008/03/03
- Re: __func__, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/03
- Re: __func__, Simon Josefsson, 2008/03/04
- Re: __func__,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: __func__, Simon Josefsson, 2008/03/06
- Re: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/06
- Re: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/06
- Re: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/06
- Re: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE, Eric Blake, 2008/03/06
- Re: __func__, Eric Blake, 2008/03/04
- Re: __func__, Simon Josefsson, 2008/03/06
- Re: __func__, Jim Meyering, 2008/03/06
- Re: __func__, Simon Josefsson, 2008/03/06
- Re: __func__, Simon Josefsson, 2008/03/06