[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnulib-tool --version
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: gnulib-tool --version |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:13:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> | If in 6 months sometimes says "my gnulib
> | is version 0.0.430-8915-dirty", how do I find out what date it is?
>
> git log 8915
Works fine. Thank you.
> At any rate, the '-dirty' suffix is
> only present if you have uncommitted changes still in your tree.
Ah, then I would call it "-modified". The opposite of "clean" is "dirty"
when you talk about your socks, but "modified" when talking about a
source code tree. (There is no "git wash" command ;-))
Bruno
- Problems with stdio.h, Gabriele Bartolini, 2008/03/13
- Re: Problems with stdio.h, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/13
- R: Problems with stdio.h, Gabriele Bartolini, 2008/03/14
- gnulib-tool --version [was: Problems with stdio.h], Eric Blake, 2008/03/14
- Re: gnulib-tool --version, Eric Blake, 2008/03/14
- Re: gnulib-tool --version, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/14
- Re: gnulib-tool --version, Eric Blake, 2008/03/14
- Re: gnulib-tool --version,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: gnulib-tool --version, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/15
- Re: gnulib-tool --version, Eric Blake, 2008/03/15
- Re: gnulib-tool --version, Bob Proulx, 2008/03/15
- Re: gnulib-tool --version, Jim Meyering, 2008/03/15
- Re: gnulib-tool --version, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/23
- Re: gnulib-tool --version, Jim Meyering, 2008/03/23
- Re: gnulib-tool --version, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/23
- Re: gnulib-tool --version, Eric Blake, 2008/03/21
- Re: gnulib-tool --version, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/23