[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bitrotate

From: Ben Pfaff
Subject: Re: bitrotate
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:48:54 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:

> One other thing: if memory serves, the C standard does not require the
> existence of uint32_t and uint16_t (this is for portability to 36-bit
> hosts, I expect); this can easily be worked around by using #ifdef
> UINT32_MAX and #ifdef UINT16_MAX.

For what it's worth: C99 doesn't require uint16_t or uint32_t,
but SUSv3 does.
Ben Pfaff 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]