[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:25:57 +0200 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> I noticed that glibc has applied some fixes to canonicalize.c that we were
> missing; and sure enough, was able to enhance the testsuite to trip these
> bugs. They also applied some assert's proving that their optimization to
> avoid
> strcpy are safe; I left the asserts out, but copied their optimization. OK to
> commit?
Sure.
Thanks for doing that!
> I plan on porting the testsuite changes to test-canonicalize.c, and fixing any
> fallout there as a separate commit.
- canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/10
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/10
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/10
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Jim Meyering, 2009/09/11
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/11
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/11
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Jim Meyering, 2009/09/16
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/16
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/17
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Eric Blake, 2009/09/17
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Jim Meyering, 2009/09/17
- Re: canonicalize-lgpl bug, Jim Meyering, 2009/09/18