[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:22:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Here's a patch.
>
> Likewise, ‘pmccabe2html’ assumes /usr/bin/awk, but I’m not sure what to
> do here:
See the documentation in pmccabe2html -- the recommended way to use the
script is already using $(AWK). So I don't think there is any problem,
is there?
> - ‘gl_PMCCABE2HTML’ does ‘AC_PROG_AWK’, so we could substitute @AWK@
> in there.
That leads to having a pmccabe2html.in which is somewhat annoying.
> - OTOH, ‘pmccabe2html’ is typically a maintainer script, so I’d rather
> remove ‘AC_PROG_AWK’ and do something similar to the patch below.
Will that work of invoked with 'awk -f pmccabe2html'?
/Simon
- Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful,
Simon Josefsson <=
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/30
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Karl Berry, 2009/10/29