[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:52:38 +0100 |
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Works like a charm on NixOS, both with ./gitlog-to-changelog and “perl
> gitlog-to-changelog”, thanks!
Good!
...
> While you’re at it, can you update the other scripts under ‘build-aux’
> that use /usr/bin/perl?
Of course.
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, (continued)
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Karl Berry, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Eric Blake, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Eric Blake, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Eric Blake, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/10/30