[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnulib-tool feature request

From: Simon Josefsson
Subject: Re: gnulib-tool feature request
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:39:09 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)

Sam Steingold <address@hidden> writes:

> On 3/1/10, Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Sam Steingold <address@hidden> writes:
>>  > as I said above, I do have a separate configure.in, gllib, glm4 in
>>  > each module.
>> I am confused.  If they are separate, how could the gnulib generated
>>  files conflict with each other?
> I use "gnulib-tool --avoid" to put the common parts in one place.

Then I believe you are a bit on your own to make sure the resulting
pieces work together, which could include applying local patches to

I tend to prefer ease of maintenance over optimizing code size for
non-modern and/or non-GNU systems.  The amount of system-replacing
gnulib object code pulled in shouldn't be too large even on older GNU
systems.  Did you try to measure the bloat size?  Which modules with
object code do you need in every sub-module?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]