[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] ftruncate: mark module as obsolete; even MinGW provides it,
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] ftruncate: mark module as obsolete; even MinGW provides it, now |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Apr 2010 19:54:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-10-28) |
Hello,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:04:38AM CEST:
> [MSVC] On one hand,
> there have been attempts to add support for this platform to libtool.
For what it's worth, there is fairly well-working support for MSVC in
Libtool's pr-msvc-support branch (as in: it passes most of the
testsuite). The code is just a bit ugly and there are a couple of
changes that might regress unrelated systems. But there are packages
out there using this branch.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: [PATCH] ftruncate: mark module as obsolete; even MinGW provides it, now, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] ftruncate: mark module as obsolete; even MinGW provides it, now, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/04/09
- Re: [PATCH] ftruncate: mark module as obsolete; even MinGW provides it, now, Jim Meyering, 2010/04/09
- Re: [PATCH] ftruncate: mark module as obsolete; even MinGW provides it, now, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/04/09
- Re: [PATCH] ftruncate: mark module as obsolete; even MinGW provides it, now, John W. Eaton, 2010/04/09
- Re: [PATCH] ftruncate: mark module as obsolete; even MinGW provides it, now, Jim Meyering, 2010/04/09
- Re: [PATCH] ftruncate: mark module as obsolete; even MinGW provides it, now, John W. Eaton, 2010/04/27
- Re: <dirent.h> on msvc, Bruno Haible, 2010/04/27
- Re: <dirent.h> on msvc, John W. Eaton, 2010/04/27
Re: [PATCH] ftruncate: mark module as obsolete; even MinGW provides it, now, Jim Meyering, 2010/04/09
MSVC support in gnulib still needed? (Re: [PATCH] ftruncate: mark module as obsolete; even MinGW provides it, now), Jarno Rajahalme, 2010/04/09
Re: [PATCH] ftruncate: mark module as obsolete; even MinGW provides it, now,
Ralf Wildenhues <=