[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] time: enforce recent POSIX ruling that time_t is integral
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] time: enforce recent POSIX ruling that time_t is integral |
|
Date: |
Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:02:39 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 |
Bruno Haible wrote:
> But why use __ as prefix? Symbols starting with __ are, generally speaking,
> in the territory of the implementation (libc + compiler), which is why gnulib
> tries to use only symbols that start with a single _.
But this symbol will appear in <time.h>, so it has both flavors: from
gnulib's point of view it is a user symbol, but from the gnulib-using
application's point of view it appears in a Standard C header. I can
see both points of view and am not sure which should prevail.
- Re: [coreutils] [PATCH 2/2] stat: print timestamps to full resolution, Eric Blake, 2010/10/08
- Re: [coreutils] [PATCH 2/2] stat: print timestamps to full resolution, Jim Meyering, 2010/10/08
- [PATCH] time: enforce recent POSIX ruling that time_t is integral, Eric Blake, 2010/10/08
- Re: [PATCH] time: enforce recent POSIX ruling that time_t is integral, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/09
- Re: [PATCH] time: enforce recent POSIX ruling that time_t is integral, Paul Eggert, 2010/10/09
- Re: [PATCH] time: enforce recent POSIX ruling that time_t is integral, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] time: enforce recent POSIX ruling that time_t is integral, Paul Eggert, 2010/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] time: enforce recent POSIX ruling that time_t is integral,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: [PATCH] time: enforce recent POSIX ruling that time_t is integral, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] time: enforce recent POSIX ruling that time_t is integral, Paul Eggert, 2010/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] time: enforce recent POSIX ruling that time_t is integral, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] time: enforce recent POSIX ruling that time_t is integral, Paul Eggert, 2010/10/10
- [PATCH] Fix mismatched parens in previous commit, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Fix mismatched parens in previous commit, Jim Meyering, 2010/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Fix mismatched parens in previous commit, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Fix mismatched parens in previous commit, Paul Eggert, 2010/10/11
- [PATCH] rewrite int foo[2*X-1] to verify(X) or to int foo[X?1:-1], Paul Eggert, 2010/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] rewrite int foo[2*X-1] to verify(X) or to int foo[X?1:-1], Bruno Haible, 2010/10/10