[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] di-set, ino-map: new modules, from coreutils
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] di-set, ino-map: new modules, from coreutils |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:27:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Jim Meyering wrote:
> > dev_t is an integral type. ... It could also be a floating-point type.
>
> As Paul said, I think we can be confident that this
> is not a problem in practice.
Yes, I agree. While defining time_t to a floating-point type would have been
understandable, for dev_t it would be outright stupid. My remark was purely
theoretical.
> Fine as well. Thanks!
I've pushed the two changes.
Bruno
--
In memoriam Ismail Semed <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ismail_Semed>
- [PATCH] di-set, ino-map: new modules, from coreutils, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/07
- Re: [PATCH] di-set, ino-map: new modules, from coreutils, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/07
- Re: [PATCH] di-set, ino-map: new modules, from coreutils, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/07
- Re: [PATCH] di-set, ino-map: new modules, from coreutils, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/08
- Re: [PATCH] di-set, ino-map: new modules, from coreutils, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/08
- Re: [PATCH] di-set, ino-map: new modules, from coreutils,
Bruno Haible <=