Re: [PATCH] file-has-acl: revert unintended change in behavior of ls -L

[Kamil Dudka]

On Monday 03 October 2011 19:54:12 Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Monday 03 October 2011 18:25:10 Bruno Haible wrote:
> >   g) Must return 0.
> >   h) Must return 0.
> >   i) Must return 0.
>
> Does the above mean that you want to change the current behavior of ls -l?

Please ignore this.  The above is correct.  My testing setup was bogus.

Kamil