[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --with-included-foo={yes,no} and which foo.h to use?
From: |
Charles Levert |
Subject: |
Re: --with-included-foo={yes,no} and which foo.h to use? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:46:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
* On Thursday 2005-07-07 at 11:25:40 +0300, Aharon Robbins wrote:
>
> One thing I've started doing in gawk, just for my own sanity, is putting
> the CVS/RCS $Id$ numbers of glibc files into the ChangeLog when I import
> them. That way, a year later I know what version I started with and I
> can look at the current glibc to see what's changed. That also makes
> it easier to see which, if any, of my changes may have filtered back
> into glibc, so that I don't need to propogate them forward.
>
> So, I recommend that practice for grep as well.
Good idea. I will rewrite the ChangeLog
entry with this in mind, and addressing Julian
concerns too.
- Re: --with-included-foo={yes,no} and which foo.h to use?, (continued)
- Re: --with-included-foo={yes,no} and which foo.h to use?, Julian Foad, 2005/07/07
- Re: --with-included-foo={yes,no} and which foo.h to use?, Stepan Kasal, 2005/07/07
- Re: --with-included-foo={yes,no} and which foo.h to use?, Aharon Robbins, 2005/07/07
- Re: --with-included-foo={yes,no} and which foo.h to use?,
Charles Levert <=
- Re: --with-included-foo={yes,no} and which foo.h to use?, Aharon Robbins, 2005/07/07