[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 22/34] maint: ensure that MB_CUR_MAX is defined even when !MB
|
From: |
Jim Meyering |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 22/34] maint: ensure that MB_CUR_MAX is defined even when !MBS_SUPPORT |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:51:43 +0200 |
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/15/2011 01:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>> +
>>> +#if ! MBS_SUPPORT
>>> +# undef MB_CUR_MAX
>>> +# define MB_CUR_MAX 1
>>> +#endif
>>> -- 1.7.7.rc0.362.g5a14
>>
>> Is this needed with gnulib? Also, if it is really needed it should be
>> patch 1 in the series, shouldn't it?
>
> Ah got it now. This is what enables patch 33. I'm not sure I like
> it, please drop it for now.
That change is required when MBS_SUPPORT is 0.
If you want to adjust things so the code compiles warning-free in that case,
please do it after I've pushed all of these changes.
- Re: [PATCH 13/34] maint: dfa: convert #if-MBS_SUPPORT (parse_bracket_exp), (continued)
- [PATCH 27/34] build: enable compilation without MBS_SUPPORT, Jim Meyering, 2011/09/15
- [PATCH 19/34] maint: dfa: convert #if-MBS_SUPPORT (dfastate), Jim Meyering, 2011/09/15
- [PATCH 29/34] maint: stop using skip_test_; use skip_ instead, Jim Meyering, 2011/09/15
- [PATCH 11/34] maint: dfa: convert #if-MBS_SUPPORT (dfaexec), Jim Meyering, 2011/09/15
- [PATCH 34/34] maint: dfa: remove case-guarding #if-MBS_SUPPORT, Jim Meyering, 2011/09/15
- [PATCH 22/34] maint: ensure that MB_CUR_MAX is defined even when !MBS_SUPPORT, Jim Meyering, 2011/09/15
Re: dfa/MBS_SUPPORT cleanup, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/09/15
Re: dfa/MBS_SUPPORT cleanup, arnold, 2011/09/15