bug-grep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] tests: exercise two recently-fixed bugs


From: Jim Meyering
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: exercise two recently-fixed bugs
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:44:20 +0100

Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 09/03/2012 12:32, Jim Meyering ha scritto:
...
>> Subject: [PATCH] tests: exercise two recently-fixed bugs
>>
>> * tests/repetition-overflow: New test for bugs fixed by commit
>> v2.10-82-gcbbc1a4.
>> * tests/Makefile.am (TESTS): Add it.
...
>> +xp1=4294967297 # 2^32+1
>> +xp2=4294967298 # 2^32+2
>> +
>> +fail=0
>> +
>> +# Before grep-2.11, when DFA-matching, a repetition count exceeding the
>> +# range of "unsigned int" would silently wrap around.   Hence, 2^32+1
>> +# would be treated just like "1", and both of these would mistakenly match.
>> +
>> +echo abc  | grep -E "b{$xp1}"   > out 2>&1; test $? = 1 || fail=1
>> +compare out /dev/null || fail=1
>> +echo abbc | grep -E "b{1,$xp2}" > out 2>&1; test $? = 1 || fail=1
>> +compare out /dev/null || fail=1
...
>
> Should this be marked as expensive?

Hi Paolo,

Why?
That test takes only a small fraction of a second.
If it's slow for you, then there must be a bug.
Or maybe you mean some other test?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]