[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: an estimated date of 0.90
From: |
OKUJI Yoshinori |
Subject: |
Re: an estimated date of 0.90 |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:35:10 +0900 |
From: Gordon Matzigkeit <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: an estimated date of 0.90
Date: 13 Jun 2001 17:27:05 -0600
> Let me know what you'd like from me.
As I said before, I'd like you to proofread the manual
thoroughly. And, you can apply patches to the CVS, instead of me. Some
patches need to be modified, though.
FYI, I have these pending patches:
* VSTa-FS
This can be applied as is mostly, and the author has already assigned
the copyright.
* EEPro100 fixes
I don't think either of these is good for GRUB. Rather, we should
update the driver from a recent Etherboot release.
* `--with-configfile' option to `bootp'
I think the name should be shorter, but the patch is not bad.
* via-rhine fix
I'm not sure if the same thing as EEPro100 fixes is appliable to this.
* ELF section table loading support
I haven't proofread this patch carefully, but I think this is ok.
* `--force-bpb'
We shouldn't integrate the patch with the official version, until the
command `install' itself can set up a BPB correctly.
* different LMA and VMA fix
This should be applied, but the patch is bad, because it uses global
variables unnecessarily.
* /dev/ida/*, etc. handling for Linux
I don't know if this should be applied, because the information from
the author is too little.
* JFS
If the author requests the inclusion...
* SiS 900 driver
I have already said the answer in another mail.
Okuji
- Re: an estimated date of 0.90, (continued)
- Re: an estimated date of 0.90, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/06/13
- Re: an estimated date of 0.90, Gordon Matzigkeit, 2001/06/13
- Re: [Bug-grub] Re: an estimated date of 0.90, Jason Thomas, 2001/06/13
- Re: [Bug-grub] Re: an estimated date of 0.90, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/06/14
- Re: [Bug-grub] Re: an estimated date of 0.90, Thierry Laronde, 2001/06/14
- Re: [Bug-grub] Re: an estimated date of 0.90, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/06/14
- Re: [Bug-grub] Re: an estimated date of 0.90, Thierry Laronde, 2001/06/14
- Re: [Bug-grub] Re: an estimated date of 0.90, Gordon Matzigkeit, 2001/06/15
- Re: [Bug-grub] Re: an estimated date of 0.90, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/06/16
- Re: [Bug-grub] Re: an estimated date of 0.90, Gordon Matzigkeit, 2001/06/16
- Re: an estimated date of 0.90,
OKUJI Yoshinori <=
RE: an estimated date of 0.90, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/06/15
RE: an estimated date of 0.90, Sergey Tzukanov, 2001/06/15