[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: grub-0.91 vs. -

From: Jochen Hoenicke
Subject: Re: grub-0.91 vs. -
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:37:35 +0200

On Saturday, 6. April 2002 18:56, address@hidden wrote:
> FYI:
> Since grub- came out, it boots successfully my kernel from
> a RAID5-SCSI-Array with reiserfs 3.x.0j
> Now I setup a new server with identical hardware but reiser
> 3.x.1a-2 and wanted to give the actual grub-0.91 a try. It compiled
> also well and I can start grub on a floppy. The problem is:

There're only two small bug fixes to reiserfs code between 
grub- and grub-0.91.

> Doing "find /boot/grub/stage1" after setting "root (hd0,0)" results
> in something like "file not found".

Does "geometry (hd0)"  detect the reiserfs partition correctly?  If 
yes, type "cat (hd0,0)/" and then press <tab> and check whether it 
can display the directories.  Try also to cat small files or follow 
symlinks.  Is there a symlink in /boot/grub/stage1?

Jochen Hoenicke, University of Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany
Email: address@hidden  Tel: +49 441 798 3124

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]