[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NetBSD hacker needed?
From: |
Yoshinori Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: NetBSD hacker needed? |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:44:53 +0100 (BST) |
--- Robert Millan <address@hidden> wrote:
> I believe this is not true currently. For NetBSD 1.6.1 GRUB was able to
> boot via:
Really!? I didn't know. IIRC, 1.5.x couldn't be booted. Someone added support
for backward compatibility? Maybe I should take a look at the archives of
NetBSD mailing lists...
> Okuji, is UFS2 ok to go for 0.9x? Note that FreeBSD 5.1 or newer default
> installs are not supported without it.
The principle is that you should add a new feature only if the feature is
critical. So if you think support for UFS2 is essential, I don't object.
But, please don't modify fsys_ffs.c. Instead, create a new file fsys_ufs2.c or
something. I don't want to break support for FFS, because it is used not only
by *BSD.
Okuji
- NetBSD hacker needed?, Shigeya Suzuki, 2003/09/06
- Re: NetBSD hacker needed?, Yoshinori Okuji, 2003/09/07
- Re: NetBSD hacker needed?, Robert Millan, 2003/09/08
- Re: NetBSD hacker needed?,
Yoshinori Okuji <=
- Re: NetBSD hacker needed?, Robert Millan, 2003/09/08
- Re: NetBSD hacker needed?, Yoshinori Okuji, 2003/09/08
- Re: NetBSD hacker needed?, Robert Millan, 2003/09/08
- Re: NetBSD hacker needed?, Shigeya Suzuki, 2003/09/08
- Re: NetBSD hacker needed?, Shigeya Suzuki, 2003/09/08
- Re: NetBSD hacker needed?, Robert Millan, 2003/09/09