[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gsl] multilarge_nlinear test failures for Solaris x86/SPARC 32/64-b
From: |
Rich Burridge |
Subject: |
[Bug-gsl] multilarge_nlinear test failures for Solaris x86/SPARC 32/64-bit with libgsl 2.2.1 and 2.3 |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:46:40 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
Hi,
I'm updating the version of libgsl in Solaris and am seeing test failures
for the multilarge_nlinear tests for both 32-bit and 64-bit on both x86
and SPARC platforms, for both libgsl version 2.2.1 and 2.3.
Here's the x86 / 32-bit failures:
...
FAIL: test
==========
trs = levenberg-marquardt
trs = levenberg-marquardt+accel
trs = dogleg
trs = double-dogleg
trs = steihaug-toint
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=levenberg/powell_badly_scaled
i=0 (1.09815933187144788e-05 observed vs 1.09815932969975976e-05 expected)
[8929]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=levenberg/powell_badly_scaled
i=1 (9.10614672185895024 observed vs 9.10614673986700218 expected) [8930]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=levenberg/weighted/powell_badly_scaled
i=0 (1.09815933187144788e-05 observed vs 1.09815932969975976e-05
expected) [8933]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=levenberg/weighted/powell_badly_scaled
i=1 (9.10614672185895024 observed vs 9.10614673986700218 expected)
[8934]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=levenberg/powell_badly_scaled
i=0 (1.09815933187144788e-05 observed vs 1.09815932969975976e-05 expected)
[9437]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=levenberg/powell_badly_scaled
i=1 (9.10614672185895024 observed vs 9.10614673986700218 expected) [9438]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=levenberg/weighted/powell_badly_scaled
i=0 (1.09815933187144788e-05 observed vs 1.09815932969975976e-05
expected) [9441]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=levenberg/weighted/powell_badly_scaled
i=1 (9.10614672185895024 observed vs 9.10614673986700218 expected)
[9442]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=more/powell_badly_scaled
i=0 (1.09815933187144788e-05 observed vs 1.09815932969975976e-05 expected)
[9945]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=more/powell_badly_scaled
i=1 (9.10614672185895024 observed vs 9.10614673986700218 expected) [9946]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=more/weighted/powell_badly_scaled
i=0 (1.09815933187144788e-05 observed vs 1.09815932969975976e-05
expected) [9949]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=more/weighted/powell_badly_scaled
i=1 (9.10614672185895024 observed vs 9.10614673986700218 expected)
[9950]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=more/powell_badly_scaled
i=0 (1.09815933187144788e-05 observed vs 1.09815932969975976e-05 expected)
[10453]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=more/powell_badly_scaled
i=1 (9.10614672185895024 observed vs 9.10614673986700218 expected) [10454]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=more/weighted/powell_badly_scaled
i=0 (1.09815933187144788e-05 observed vs 1.09815932969975976e-05
expected) [10457]
FAIL:
trust-region/steihaug-toint/solver=cholesky/scale=more/weighted/powell_badly_scaled
i=1 (9.10614672185895024 observed vs 9.10614673986700218 expected)
[10458]
FAIL test (exit status: 1)
The others are similar.
If I adjust the tolerance in the test_powell3.c test program with the
following change:
--- gsl-2.2.1/multilarge_nlinear/test_powell3.c.orig 2017-01-10
10:33:08.905770897 +0000
+++ gsl-2.2.1/multilarge_nlinear/test_powell3.c 2017-01-10
10:47:34.330655639 +0000
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#define powell3_P 2
static double powell3_x0[powell3_P] = { 0.0, 1.0 };
-static double powell3_epsrel = 1.0e-10;
+static double powell3_epsrel = 1.0e-8;
static double powell3_J[powell3_N * powell3_P];
then the tests successfully pass.
I can easily patch our version of libgsl for this, but if this is an
acceptable change, it would be nice if you could make a similar adjustment
to the master sources.
Thanks.
- [Bug-gsl] multilarge_nlinear test failures for Solaris x86/SPARC 32/64-bit with libgsl 2.2.1 and 2.3,
Rich Burridge <=