bug-guile
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

guile compile problems on solaris 2.7 with gcc 3.1


From: puneet
Subject: guile compile problems on solaris 2.7 with gcc 3.1
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:53:03 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.090012 (Oort Gnus v0.12) Emacs/21.2.93 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7)

Hello

        I am not able to compile guile on my solaris 2.7 machine with
        gcc 3.2.1. Though with gcc 2.95.3, I am not facing any
        problems.

        With gcc 3.2.1 I get 

cat alist.doc arbiters.doc async.doc backtrace.doc boolean.doc chars.doc 
continuations.doc debug.doc dynl.doc dynwind.doc environments.doc eq.doc 
error.doc eval.doc evalext.doc extensions.doc feature.doc fluids.doc fports.doc 
gc.doc goops.doc gsubr.doc guardians.doc hash.doc hashtab.doc hooks.doc 
init.doc ioext.doc iselect.doc keywords.doc lang.doc list.doc load.doc 
macros.doc mallocs.doc modules.doc numbers.doc objects.doc objprop.doc 
options.doc pairs.doc ports.doc print.doc procprop.doc procs.doc properties.doc 
random.doc rdelim.doc read.doc root.doc rw.doc scmsigs.doc script.doc 
simpos.doc smob.doc sort.doc srcprop.doc stackchk.doc stacks.doc stime.doc 
strings.doc strop.doc strorder.doc strports.doc struct.doc symbols.doc 
throw.doc values.doc variable.doc vectors.doc version.doc vports.doc weaks.doc 
symbols-deprecated.doc ramap.doc unif.doc filesys.doc posix.doc net_db.doc 
socket.doc regex-posix.doc inet_aton.doc | 
GUILE="/tmp/install/guile-1.6.1/pre-inst-guile" 
../scripts/snarf-check-and-output-texi --manual > guile.texi || { rm 
guile.texi; false; }
make[3]: *** [guile.texi] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/install/guile-1.6.1/libguile'


        Actually when I try pre-inst-guile, I am getting a segfault

$ /tmp/install/guile-1.6.1/pre-inst-guile
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)


        Please let me know if anybody has compiled guile on solaris
        machine using gcc 3.2.1.

        Otherwise I can help with debugging if somebody can guide me.

Regards
Puneet Goel
        

-- 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]