Re: [DOCPATCH]Revamp of doc/ref/scheme-control.texi

[Stephen Compall]

Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:
> It'll be easier to review if you post independent changes separately,
> showing the new text.

Agreed.

> >     * scheme-control.texi (while do): Continue converting to active
> >     voice.
> 
> I wouldn't worry about that sort of thing, not unless it's really
> unclear.

I don't know about that, but the named let section and do section were
suddenly much clearer after I converted them.  I suppose those two
would qualify for that criteria, but I seem only able to tell in
hindsight, that is after changing the voice, and it is *always* an
improvement.  That's why I just swept the text.

> >     * scheme-control.texi (begin): Added note about begin's
> >     uselessness.
> 
> Well, it's only sometimes not required.  If you want to add something,
> then perhaps a typical use in an `if'.

Just kidding :)

> >     Untabified.
> >     Fixed result indication in call-with-values example.
> 
> Thanks, I applied these bits.

I assume you want me to repropose the remainder of the changes on
guile-devel, as suggested earlier?

--
Stephen Compall or s11 or sirian

The study of non-linear physics is like the study of non-elephant biology.

BROMURE national information infrastructure Indigo event security
clandestine nuclear benelux Soviet Capricorn e-cash Roswell
Leuken-Baden AVN quarter bemd