[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fix for _Complex_I problems

From: Neil Jerram
Subject: Re: Fix for _Complex_I problems
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:07:10 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Greg Troxel <address@hidden> writes:

> Adding a remedial
> #define _Complex_I 1.0fi
> to the beginning of numbers.c if _Complex_I weren't defined would seem
> less objectionable, and also work.

Just one detail for the record: unfortunately that wouldn't work for
GCC on AIX, because there:

- complex.h does define _Complex_I: #define _Complex_I __I
- the AIX compiler provides __I, so complex.h works with the AIX
- GCC does not provide __I, so the setup doesn't work with GCC (but
  `#ifdef _Complex_I' is still true)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]