Re: [bug #30070] multiple returns from map

[Andy Wingo]

On Sat 13 Aug 2011 17:56, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <address@hidden> writes:

> Yes a tail pointer was a mind slip . But I did
> changed the final reverse! to the functional reverse in the srfi-1 version of 
> map
> and doing that should be enough.

Yes, however there is a performance penalty.  We should probably do that
for R6RS.  But long-term, we need a solution that does not impose a
performance penalty.  That solution is to map recursively instead of
iteratively.

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/