[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-pub
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 22:37:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi!
Ian Price <address@hidden> skribis:
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> You now have commit access, so you’re welcome to commit it by yourself!
>> :-)
> I have :-)
Great, thanks!
>> Please post patches before committing, for a start. Make sure to always
>> rebase before committing, to avoid gratuitous merge commits if somebody
>> else pushed changes in the meantime. If you have any doubts with Git,
>> please ask us.
> Rebasing is already standard practice when sending patches, so no
> trouble there.
Yeah, that’s what I suspected anyway. ;-)
> +Prior to guile 2.0, guile provided a type of definition known colloquially
Should really be “Guile 2.0” and “Guile”, with a capital ‘G’, when
talking about the package.
Other than that, looks good to me.
Thank you!
Ludo’.
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/09/03
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does, Ian Price, 2012/09/04
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/09/05
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does, Ian Price, 2012/09/06
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- bug#12341: define does not support lambda shorthand notation, define-public does, Ian Price, 2012/09/06