bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#34181: guile-hall: no code for module (config)


From: Alex Sassmannshausen
Subject: bug#34181: guile-hall: no code for module (config)
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 10:41:42 +0100

Hi Ricardo

On 25 Jan 2019 5:24 PM, Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> wrote:


Hi Jack,

> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
>
>> Hi Jack,
>>
>> Thanks for your bug report — this is super helpful to debug the
>> guile-build-system in guix!
>>
>> Jack Hill writes:
>>
>>> The guile-hall package appears to be broken. All hall commands that I
>>> run result in a "no code for module (config)" error.
>>
>> The Guile build system propagates installs of dependent
>> modules. Guile-Hall depends on Guile-Config, and it looks like it is
>> built fine as part of the built process.
>>
>> What I'm curious about is whether your search paths are set correctly?
>>
>> Would you mind trying the following commands:
>> $ guile -c "(use-modules (config))"
>> $ guile -c "(use-modules (hall clean))"
>
> Both of these end produce a backtrace that ends in "no code for module
> (config)" or "… (hall clean)"
>
>> $ echo $GUILE_LOAD_PATH +++ $GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH
>
> /run/current-system/profile/share/guile/site/2.2 and
> /run/current-system/profile/lib/guile/2.2/site-ccache
>
> So it looks like my environment variables aren't set correctly?
>
> Is this a user error on my part? I had hoped that guix environment
> would set these if needed. I also tried installing guile-hall in my
> profile, and a warning about needed vars didn't get printed nor where
> they added to my profile's etc/profile.

This is likely a problem with the guile-hall package.  It should wrap
the executables in GUILE_LOAD_PATH and GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH.

I don't think it is, please see my emails on this patch.

The binary wraps the paths.

It's actually to do with the user needing both guile and the desired guile module in profile/environment.

Hth


Alex


Would you like to send a patch to fix this?

--
Ricardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]