[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?
From: |
Niklas Hoglund |
Subject: |
Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Dec 2001 16:57:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.24i |
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 04:41:05PM +0100, Ondrej Hurt wrote:
> But how will the task manager know it should delete a task and
> perform some cleanup, if it is not told by its incapacitated
> exception handler ? You would have to check all tasks periodically,
> no ?
Does it have to know? The task manager doesn't kill tasks that loop
endlessly (in the while(1) {} sense), so why does it have to kill a
task that has disabled signals (by overriding the signal handler), and
loops generating signals?
Of course, SIGKILL mustn't be overridable, as you'd be unable to kill
the task then.
--
Niklas
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, (continued)
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/20
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/20
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Espen Skoglund, 2001/12/21
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/21
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Ondrej Hurt, 2001/12/23
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/23
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Ondrej Hurt, 2001/12/27
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?,
Niklas Hoglund <=
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Ondrej Hurt, 2001/12/20
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Jean Wolter, 2001/12/20
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/20
Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/20
RE: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Volkmar Uhlig, 2001/12/23
Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Ondrej Hurt, 2001/12/27