[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: Why GNU Mach is so different? |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Dec 2001 05:25:47 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.6.0 (Twist And Shout) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (Unebigoryoae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) |
At Sun, 30 Dec 2001 16:09:57 +0100 (CET),
Farid Hajji wrote:
> Regarding CORBA: The only part of it that we'll need in the Hurd
> right now, is a good IDL stub generator that could replace MIG.
> The path right now looks like we're needing to switch to flick
> IDL compiler and change the *.defs with *.idl(s). Then, we could
> use e.g. DICE or IDL4 to generate stubs for L4 instead of Mach.
> Other CORBA stuff looks currently like unnecessary overhead to me.
Just my curiosity: Is it difficult to convert CORBA (or DCE) to MiG?
If that's easy, we could use (such a converter | mig) for Mach and
IDL4 (or DICE) for L4...
Okuji