[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uname -s
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: uname -s |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 03:39:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:37:36PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>
> I have asked on bug-gnu-utils@gnu.org about why -s should print the
> kernel name instead of the operating system implementation.
thanks. have you pointed them to the archived discussion?:
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-hurd/2002-October/010687.html
CCing in any case
--
Robert Millan
"5 years from now everyone will be running
free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5"
Andrew S. Tanenbaum, 30 Jan 1992
- uname -s, Petri Koistinen, 2002/10/21
- Re: uname -s, Robert Millan, 2002/10/23
- Re: uname -s, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/23
- Re: uname -s, Robert Millan, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: uname -s, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s, Robert Millan, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Robert Millan, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Jeff Bailey, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Robert Millan, 2002/10/31
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/31