[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uname -s
|
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
|
Subject: |
Re: uname -s |
|
Date: |
24 Oct 2002 11:05:56 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es> writes:
> According to documentation of BSD Unix [1], the uname command appeared
> in 4.4BSD distribution, and the -s option is suposed to:
Oy, it gets even more confusing. BSD has always used the term
"operating system" to refer to the kernel.
In any case, the output of a GNU/Hurd system on uname should match
other GNU systems, and I don't see it as a particularly Hurd-specific
issue.
- uname -s, Petri Koistinen, 2002/10/21
- Re: uname -s, Robert Millan, 2002/10/23
- Re: uname -s, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/23
- Re: uname -s, Robert Millan, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: uname -s, Robert Millan, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Robert Millan, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Jeff Bailey, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Robert Millan, 2002/10/31
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/31
Re: uname -s, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/10/24