[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: serverboot
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: serverboot |
Date: |
19 Dec 2002 12:27:27 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu> writes:
> > The problem with having them still in the tree is that it's not obvious
> > at a quick glance which tools are pieces aer still in use and worth
> > learning when you're a new person. As an example, when James Morrison
> > was doing patch reviews and sending a patch nearly every week a frequent
> > response was "That code is never used".
>
> This is an excellent reason for looking at releases, rather than
> leaving CVS as what we have instead of doing releases.
>
> You know that looking at the release of the Hurd (latest release is
> 0.2, and was released in 1997 if I am correct) is quite useless. :-)
Which is why we should *do* releases, rather than leaving CVS as the
non-official release.
> Still, is the unused code somehow filtered out from the source tree
> when a release is made?
See hurd/Makefile.
- Re: serverboot, (continued)
Re: serverboot, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/18
- Re: serverboot, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/18
- Re: serverboot, Jeff Bailey, 2002/12/18
- Re: serverboot, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Jeff Bailey, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: serverboot, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/19
- Re: serverboot, Philip Charles, 2002/12/19