[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple? |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 13:25:43 -0400 (EDT) |
> Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com> writes:
>
> > We're agreed that we don't want a distinct tuple for most purposes.
>
> I disagree slightly. I'd say that for most purposes we don't *need* a
> distinct tuple, which is not quite the same thing.
I asked before if you wanted one, and I thought you said you didn't.
If you do, tell me why.
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, (continued)
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/04/04
- Binutils patches, Jeff Bailey, 2003/04/04
- Re: Binutils patches, Roland McGrath, 2003/04/04
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Jeff Bailey, 2003/04/04
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Roland McGrath, 2003/04/04
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Roland McGrath, 2003/04/04
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Niels Möller, 2003/04/08
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Niels Möller, 2003/04/08